Gregarius » Looking for Someone to Lie to Me

Looking for Someone to Lie to Me (10 unread)

US disrupts Swiss prosecution of AQ Khan network cell

Posted: May 26th, 2006, 10:23am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Joby Warrick at the Washington Post this morning has this news from David Albright's recent testimony before a House committee:

The problem was brought to light yesterday by a U.S. weapons expert who is advising Swiss prosecutors on the technical aspects of the Khan case. In testimony before a subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee, David Albright said the U.S. government had "ignored multiple requests for cooperation" in prosecuting members of the Khan network.

"The prosecutors have not received a reply, or even a confirmation that the U.S. government received the requests," Albright, a nuclear expert and president of the Institute for Science and International Security, told the panel. He said the lack of assistance "needlessly complicates" an investigation of great importance to both countries.

Swiss officials are seeking to bring charges against three businessmen who allegedly played pivotal roles in Khan's smuggling scheme. Swiss authorities have arrested Friedrich Tinner, a Swiss mechanical engineer, and his two sons, Urs and Marco, who are suspected of supplying the network with technology and equipment used in enriching uranium. Urs Tinner is also suspected of helping Khan set up a secret Malaysian factory that made thousands of components for gas centrifuges, machines used in uranium enrichment. Formal charges have not yet been brought against them.

I feel like there's just this litany of unfulfilled pledges that President Bush made in the WMD nonproliferation strategy he mapped out in 2004, and this is just the latest failure. It's like the strategy was articulated so President Bush could show repeatedly what he simply has not managed to accomplish. Look at the NDU speech in question:

Second, I call on all nations to strengthen the laws and international controls that govern proliferation. At the U.N. last fall, I proposed a new Security Council resolution requiring all states to criminalize proliferation, enact strict export controls, and secure all sensitive materials within their borders. The Security Council should pass this proposal quickly. And when they do, America stands ready to help other governments to draft and enforce the new laws that will help us deal with proliferation.
Why oh why have we failed to enact this promise in the Swiss case? They asked for help four times over the past year. This administration just isn't serious about preventing WMD proliferation - don't let anyone get away with saying that they are.
Putting together 2 and 2 and 2 for Business Week

Posted: May 24th, 2006, 8:24pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Business Week reports:
President George W. Bush has bestowed on his intelligence czar, John Negroponte, broad authority, in the name of national security, to excuse publicly traded companies from their usual accounting and securities-disclosure obligations. Notice of the development came in a brief entry in the Federal Register, dated May 5, 2006, that was opaque to the untrained eye.

Unbeknownst to almost all of Washington and the financial world, Bush and every other President since Jimmy Carter have had the authority to exempt companies working on certain top-secret defense projects from portions of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. Administration officials told BusinessWeek that they believe this is the first time a President has ever delegated the authority to someone outside the Oval Office. It couldn't be immediately determined whether any company has received a waiver under this provision.
Meanwhile, they add, they can't find evidence that such waivers have been granted. But I think we've got a few examples of the kinds of businesses that might apply for and receive such a waiver from a more strongly empowered Director of National Intelligence.

Part One - Corrupt Contractors

Our friend Laura Rozen warned of the national security implications of the Duke Cunningham scandal:
CIA contracts are not public, and there’s an added veil of secrecy and opaqueness to the “black” contracting world. Cunningham bragged about his ability to help influence the procuring of contracts from this secretive Congressional source in a letter to San Diego contractors, saying he was in a position to influence the awarding of “black” contracts after he was assigned to the House Intelligence committee in 2001. An individual who has been identified in press reports as Co-conspirator One in the Cunningham indictment, San Diego-based defense contractor Brent Wilkes, who has not yet been charged, has more than a dozen companies in his corporate empire. Efforts by journalists to sort out which companies might have received CIA contracts have gotten nowhere -- until now.
On December 8, the Prospect received an anonymous tip about CIA contracts: The name of a Wilkes-affiliated company that allegedly had received some of them. The company is called Archer Logistics, which is, according to its website, a US-based “open source acquisition group … uniquely positioned to execute rapid acquisition requests, provide immediate delivery channels and augment post-sales support. ...Archer Logistics has also developed a unique delivery structure that can provide turnaround times of 24 hours in cases of extreme need.” (Its name is similar to a Senate-registered, Wilkes-affiliate company Archer Defense, “a defense logistics and technology company,” but not, apparently, the same company.) According to its website, incorporation documents in the Commonwealth of Virginia and public-online address books, Archer Logistics is located in the same Chantilly, Virginia address that houses the Virginia offices of ADCS, Inc. Neither Archer Logistics nor the ADCS Chantilly office answered the phone, and neither has responded to numerous messages.
When asked about whether Archer Logistics was receiving CIA contracts, a spokesman for the CIA told the Prospect on December 9 that “as a rule, the CIA does not publicly discuss who may or may not have a contractual relationship with the Agency.” Previously, the CIA had indicated that other Wilkes-affiliated companies – ADCS, Pure Aqua Technologies, Perfect Wave Technologies, Group W Transport – did not have contracts with the Agency.

Maybe it used to be that you could catch some of these guys on the balance sheet if they tried to make certain incomes disappear....but not anymore if they've got the right buddies willing to wave a magic wand and make their earnings disappear.

Part Two - Winged Torture

The recently dismissed case filed by the ACLU on behalf of Khaled el-Masri charged that the firm Aero Contractors Limited had run afoul of the Alien Tort Statute by helping to illegally detain the German national in Afghanistan without charge. An Indymedia report from Atlanta gives you more details on the North Carolina-based company that helped fly el-Masri to justice.

Maybe it's going to be harder for the CIA to use front companies in the future; but perhaps they won't have to, they can charter legitimate flights from legitimate companies for big money that the CFO won't have to report.

***

So, Business Week, there you go - follow up on those leads, and if you don't hopefully someone else will.

And why take this out of the President's hands? BW doesn't really try to answer this question, either. I would suggest that deniability sure becomes more plausible if no one in the White House knows about the decision - the order is simply given to make paper trails disappear. And with attorneys like the ACLU and CCR employing chain of command theories to prosecute our rogue White House and Cabinet officials for the awful acts they have endorsed or perhaps become linked into, I'm sure they want protection.
Turkish judges shot

Posted: May 22nd, 2006, 12:07pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

My darling girlfriend visiting home in Istanbul alerts me to a story few have really been paying much attention to here. Five judges of Turkey's Council of State, its highest administrative court, were shot last week. One of them, Mustafa Ozbilgin died, and his funeral prompted serious protests. The killer, Alparslan Aslan, was himself an attorney. The Turkish Daily News sums up pretty well:

The attack on the Council of State judges on Wednesday, seen largely as an attack on secularism, sent shockwaves through Turkish politics, and thousands of people took to the streets to protest the attack as well as the government, which they said encouraged the attack with statements criticizing the top court in the past.
Aslan shouted Islamist slogans after the shooting and has reportedly said in his police interrogation that he shot the judges to protest an earlier decision they made to bar the promotion of a teacher because she wore a headscarf outside of school.

But newspapers yesterday reported new findings indicating links with ultranationalist gangs responsible for an attempted assassination against human rights activist Akın Birdal and revealing that his accomplices were criminals charged with theft and other ordinary crimes.

Reuters reports that four have been charged - quite alarming that this was a cabal apparently, and not merely a kooky individual.

This seems remarkably underreported. In the blog world, it seems like The Corner at the National Review is about the only place to really pick up on this in any serious way. And where the NRO goes, rightwingnuttery follows. Take Michael Ledeen for instance who says that he counted Ozbilgin as a friend:

If we continue to dither along as we are at present, the day will come when some disgusting animals shouting "God is great" burst into our courtrooms and kill our judges, and the deranged elite of this country will wonder what terrible things we have done to provoke such carnage.
Deranged elite, indeed! Let's get into the wayback machine and look at Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, who said on April 4, 2005 the following:

I don't know if there is a cause-and-effect connection but we have seen some recent episodes of courthouse violence in this country. Certainly nothing new, but we seem to have run through a spate of courthouse violence recently that's been on the news and I wonder whether there may be some connection between the perception in some quarters on some occasions where judges are making political decisions yet are unaccountable to the public, that it builds up and builds up and builds up to the point where some people engage in - engage in violence.
You see, this is the problem that crops up when a social liberal like Mike Ledeen decides to get in bed with a frightening domestic ideology to advance the international goals he shares with empire-minded people. The people shooting judges in our country aren't the Democrats or even the Greens; neither are they Muslims of any stripe. They are the same scary-ass Christian Fundamentalists that Karl Rove keeps getting out to vote in every election of national significance, and the people helping to advance the National Review's foreign policy have more in common with Alparslan Aslan than they do with the "deranged elite" that he's pointing to.

Faster, please....your retirement from public commentary, I mean.
Brave New War

Posted: May 15th, 2006, 10:22am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

I recently read a few things about The War Tapes, a documentary project put together by Deborah Scranton, a TV reporter who rather than embed herself with a unit during the Iraq War handed cameras over to three soldiers who recorded their own footage and offered their own commentary. Scranton communicated with them via IM the whole time, giving them advice on how to be filmmakers.

Brave new world indeed. References on the site's blog to IM conversations between one of the soldiers and his wife during the war. Randi Moriarty sitting at a typically bland looking office cubicle declares of her husband "I hear a lot more than I want to." I know from my Uncle Louis who fought in Italy during World War Two that the letters sent back home to family and friends were heavily censored, and I get to wondering - is IM traffic from Iraq to the homefront being monitored? If you say too much, is some guy going to clip off the conversation and maybe send military police to arrest you?

One of the common themes about the coverage of this film is like this declaration from the Cinematical website:

The current Iraq War is possibly the most misreported American military engagement in history. Embed reporters are heavily censored, each network has its own spin, and it's simply not in our government's interest to disseminate details on what's really going on.
And, that led to this question reported by Bryan Bender at the Boston Globe :

''It has by far the best footage I have seen out of Iraq," said Paul Reickhoff, executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and author of ''Chasing Ghosts," a blunt and edgy new memoir about his tour as an Army platoon leader in Iraq. The film, he said, does a better job of ''putting you in the boots of the soldier in the Humvee" than network news and other embedded journalists did.'

'But more importantly," Reickhoff added, ''they also show when they come home and the issues like post-traumatic stress disorder and the cost of war once these guys return. I am still surprised the Army let them do it without pulling the plug."
So, maybe this is a question the filmmakers can add to their FAQ - how did you deal with the military censorship that everyone talks so much about? What kind of stuff that the soldiers recorded didn't make it to the screen because it was too sensitive?
Reading around Dana Priest

Posted: May 2nd, 2006, 8:45pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Seems like Dana Priest has to explain herself all the time when it comes to her Pulitzer-winning stories that led to the news of the secret prisons. Sometimes when she does this, some cats jump out of the bags that those editors on 15th street stuffed them into:

The administration asked us not to name the countries for two reasons: first, those countries might be subject to terrorist retaliation. Second, that those countries might decide to cease cooperating with the US on other counterterrorist operations (emphasis added).
Therefore, next time someone says "it was just their intelligence services running around behind the governments' backs," I think it's safe to not believe them.

Oh Ms. Priest. Those of us who want this country to be saved from what's eating at the heart of it are so happy with what you've accomplished, but I think a lot of us wish that you'd stop being such a trooper about the mushy spines your editors have.
Sectarian strife comes to Williamsburg

Posted: April 29th, 2006, 9:28pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Intra-religious conflict isn't just for warring factions in Iraq anymore. The death of Grand Rebbe Moshe Teitelbaum of the Satmar sect of Chasidic Judaism brought news attention far beyond New York. London's Guardian offered one of the many sketches of the funerary problems provoked by the passing of Rebbe Teitelbaum, who sat astride what is frequently said to be the largest Orthodox Jewish sect in the world, at more than 100,000. Most of that community is concentrated in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, and the upstate hamlet of Kiryas Joel.

Teitelbaum's passing crystallized a dispute between his two oldest sons who both claim to be heir to the Rebbe's followers and the hundreds of millions of dollars of assets controlled by the Satmars. Though the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports that the Rebbe was trying to split his virtual kingdom in two because it had grown too large, younger son Zalmen claims that a 2002 will invested all powers in him according to the Times Herald-Record. His older brother Aron wasted no time issuing a press release (posted at the New York Observer's Politicker) announcing that he would return to residence in Williamsburg and assume the status of Rebbe granted to him by a number of authorities within the Satmar community. However, the Washington Post claims that the Rebbe had grown concerned with Aron's headstrong behavior and didn't think he could rule the whole sect.

The Forward's coverage reports on the heavy police presence set up at the site of the funeral, in addition to a bevy of other rich detail from the scene. The need for the presence seems less strange when you ponder the history of conflict that has erupted between the followers of Aron and Zalmen, as well as the rival funeral events set up by the divided brothers within close proximity to one another, according to the Daily News.

Meanwhile, both Senator Hillary Clinton and Governor George Pataki were careful to show their respects in a manner that didn't come down in favor of one side over the other. Maybe President Bush should consult them next time he has to figure out how the Green Zone reacts to provocation by sects within Iraq's Shi'ite communities.
The Mary McCarthy leak that wasn't

Posted: April 25th, 2006, 10:02am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Yesterday Newsweek and today the Washington Post report that almost retired CIA analyst Mary McCarthy was not Dana Priest's source for the claim that the CIA's secret prisons were located in Eastern Europe:

McCarthy was fired because the CIA concluded that she had undisclosed contacts with journalists, including Priest, in violation of a security agreement. That does not mean she revealed the existence of the prisons to Priest, Cobb said.

Cobb said that McCarthy, who worked in the CIA inspector general's office, "did not have access to the information she is accused of leaking," namely the classified information about any secret detention centers in Europe. Having unreported media contacts is not unheard of at the CIA but is a violation of the agency's rules.

Over at Today's Papers, Eric Umansky suggests the following:

"Intelligence sources" told the WP that McCarthy knew generally about the prisons—as did any interested citizen—but didn't know the prisons' locations, which is what was new in the WP's scoop.
But here's the thing, Dana Priest might have revealed even less than many think she did. Remember, the Post was unwilling to say which Eastern European countries housed the prisons. Months before that story was printed, consider this bit of reporting dropped into Jane Mayer's January 2005 New Yorker dispatch on "extraordinary rendition":

Rendition is just one element of the Administration’s New Paradigm. The C.I.A. itself is holding dozens of “high value” terrorist suspects outside of the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., in addition to the estimated five hundred and fifty detainees in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. The Administration confirmed the identities of at least ten of these suspects to the 9/11 Commission—including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a top Al Qaeda operative, and Ramzi bin al-Shibh, a chief planner of the September 11th attacks—but refused to allow commission members to interview the men, and would not say where they were being held. Reports have suggested that C.I.A. prisons are being operated in Thailand, Qatar, and Afghanistan, among other countries.
The facility in Thailand was one that Priest had particularly reported as being closed up since news reports in June 2003 outed its existence. (She also indicated that Zambia was sourced as a possibility - you can't get much more bizarre than that) Has the CIA gotten to work on going after who outed that piece of unlawful handiwork, or are David Corn and Josh Marshall right and this is just an effort to purge donors to the Democratic party from the CIA's payroll?
America, the Europeans, and International Law

Posted: April 19th, 2006, 9:23am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Kudoes to Steve Clemons for getting Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's legal adviser John Bellinger to speak on the record regarding our most recent take on what passes in America for commitment to international law. For instance:

The term unlawful combatant is a term that’s been around for about 40 or 50 years, clearly accepted in all of the international law textbooks. It applies to the category of people who are fighting you in a war, but are doing so in an unlawful way, i.e they’re fighting your civilians rather than you or their otherwise not following the rules. And so therefore they’re not entitled to the normal protections of the Geneva conventions. So they’re called unlawful combatants.

So this is not a term that we made up. Similarly I’ve walked people through our legal theory on the Geneva conventions. And we get conflicting criticisms through Europe. Just in the last few weeks we had the U.N. (unclear) wishers come out and say “the U.S. has got it all wrong, flagrantly violating international law. The people in Guantanamo are criminals who need to be tried in the criminal system or let go."

But at the same time we are regularly getting communications from people saying, “No no! These people are people captured on the battlefield. You need to be making them prisoners of war and applying the Geneva conventions."

And therein lies really sort of the confusion. It’s that there are not clear rules that apply to individuals who are captured by our soldiers on the battlefield 3000 miles away. One can have wonderful debates about Padilla and Hamdi and people who we found inside the United States and their constitutional rights, but it’s just not at all clear what the legal rules are that apply to people captured on the battlefield a long way away who are not party to the Geneva conventions who don’t follow the Geneva convention rules.
Yeah, but the Geneva Convention requires that the US quickly review the status of such "unlawful combatants" and grant them POW or civilian status. And, when it appears that really only 8% of these "unlawful combatants" at Guantanamo are al Qaeda, you begin to have a problem. Holding these people indefinitely really just means that you are moving them from unlawful combatant status into unlawful detention. The Bush administration just keeps hoping that everyone will forget who these bad guys are, and that America can disappear them in order to wash its hands of the situation.

Meanwhile, Bellinger remarks:

And I think frankly that we’re beginning to make a little bit of headway on this argument; that we’re at a deep hole on the issue of detainees. We know that there are those concerns that are out there. I think that we’re beginning to persuade some European audiences after Secretary Rice’s trip in December and our talks on these issues. But these are not as easy as people would think. And that in fact that maybe the rules are not quite as clear as critics would have one believe and that we need to begin to work together. There is a desire in Europe to be with us on these issues and a desire to work together. And if we can begin to try to reach common ground on what the legal rules are that apply to people like this. So we’ve been doing a lot of work in the detainee area.
But, as Katrin Bennhold remarks in a dynamite article in the International Herald Tribune, Europe's position on human rights in regards to the war on terrorism is getting incredibly compromised:

But many European governments have extended their own surveillance and prosecution powers. On Thursday, the latest counterterrorism legislation came into force in Britain. Now a number of officials, lawyers, and human rights experts say that Europe, too, is experiencing a slow erosion of civil liberties as governments increasingly put the prevention of possible terrorist actions ahead of concerns to protect the rights of people suspected, but not convicted, of a crime.

Although changes are not as marked as in the United States, there has been slippage in Europe on commitments under international treaties like the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN Convention Against Torture, the experts say.

"We are fiddling with rights that only a few years ago seemed untouchable," said Álvaro Gil-Robles, human rights commissioner at the Council of Europe, the Continent's chief rights watchdog.

The two most contentious areas concern treatment of terror suspects, he said. Several European countries are extending the period during which suspects may be held without charge or restricted in their freedom. And some nations appear to be moving toward accepting cooperation with governments known to torture prisoners.

Investigators say that international terrorism mandates new approaches, and that criminal law is ill equipped to handle the threat.

"We always think about the rights of the terrorists," said August Hanning, Germany's deputy interior minister and a former intelligence chief. "But if there is an attack that you could have prevented, you also have to be able to look into the eyes of the relatives."

Italy and the Netherlands, for example, have relaxed the conditions under which intelligence services can eavesdrop. French legislation recently gave investigators broader access to telephone and Internet data. German legislation being drawn up seeks to allow intelligence services easier access to bank and car registration data.

The new British legislation outlaws the "glorification" of terrorism, an offense that critics warn is so vague that it could be applied arbitrarily.

But the debate about detention rules and the ban on torture has caused the biggest controversy.

"Something pretty fundamental is going on," said Gareth Peirce, a lawyer at Birnberg and Peirce in London who represents the Algerian under surveillance in north London and nine other Middle Eastern and North African men arrested within months of Sept. 11 without a formal charge. "A number of countries have been trying to avoid their treaty obligations in relation to arbitrary detention and torture," she said.

One broad trend has been the extension of police custody and restriction of legal representation.

In December, France increased its period of detention without charge for terror suspects to six days from four; during the first three days, the uncharged suspects may be denied access to a lawyer. Italy last year extended custody to 24 hours from 12 and authorized the police to interrogate detainees in the absence of their lawyers. In 2003 Spain extended the period in which suspected terrorists can be held effectively incommunicado to a maximum 13 days, according to Human Rights Watch.

Britain has gone farthest. The latest law doubles the period during which a terror suspect can be held in custody without charge to 28 days. It was just 48 hours in 2001, and Prime Minister Tony Blair fought for an extension to three months.
Ultimately, whatever Bellinger says to those European audiences may just be a safety valve - the Europeans are doing wrong, but at least they can say "hey, we're not so bad as the Americans." Which I'm sure our policymakers don't mind so much - it's sort of like the philandering pastor who can't look the pimp in the eye on Sunday morning.
NYT picks up on Ridgeway's firing

Posted: April 19th, 2006, 8:18am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

The Times reported on problems at the Village Voice yesterday, and included this perspective on Ridgeway's ouster, which I thought was awfully nice of them to print:
Mr. Ridgeway's termination followed several other staff changes at The Voice.
On March 14, Doug Simmons left as the newspaper's acting editor, having overseen the publication of a story about dating in New York that contained fabricated anecdotes and was later retracted. (His departure was announced with a handwritten note from Mr. Lacey on a napkin that was posted on The Voice's Web site, according to The Associated Press.) The writer, Nick Sylvester, was later fired.
Mr. Simmons's predecessor, The Voice's editor in chief for nine years, Don Forst, quit in December; the publisher, Judith Miszner, followed in January. Members of the paper's fact-checking staff have also been removed, other staff members said.
But more than anything, it was the dismissal of Mr. Ridgeway, whose subjects have included the neo-Nazi movement, Three Mile Island and Sept. 11, that provoked the staff, said Tom Robbins, a writer and union steward at The Voice. "James Ridgeway is regarded as the DNA of The Village Voice," he said. "In the best sense, he really defined journalism coming from an advocacy perspective and giving everyone a fair shot."
Another writer, Jennifer Gonnerman, 35, left the paper two weeks ago, but she said the move was to pursue other writing opportunities, not a show of protest.
She found Mr. Ridgeway's termination surprising, she said. "It's these older guys that, just like any newsroom, they're walking encyclopedias," she said of Mr. Ridgeway and Mr. Schanberg. "To lose them is a giant loss."
...and awfully nice of Jennifer Gonnerman to say.
Iowa City tornado

Posted: April 17th, 2006, 5:53pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Iowa City, where I attended college for four years at the University of Iowa, got shredded by a tornado last Thursday night. I had the good fortune of never experiencing one while I lived there - whenever we had nasty weather, tornadoes only seemed to touch down to the north and to the south of town. I've always speculated that Iowa City was missed because people who picked locations for human settlements knew back in the 19th century how to plan smartly in ecological terms. But, then you start to see the photos, and you wonder.

There's a lot of shots of wreckage, but these are particularly affecting for me. Try this one first:

Overhead, Iowa Avenue, from the Daily Iowan. The building in the middle to the the right hand side of the bottom was my residence in 2000-01 with my good friend Ryan Sayre. The section right in the middle was our old apartment. The roof is completely shredded.

But, the full details are only revealed from this street-level shot below taken by someone at the University - the apartment that was next door to ours is completely devastated and gone, and it looks like the roof on our apartment was completely sheared off. I remember spending hours and hours on that terrance studying, eating, drinking beer, talking shit. I used to watch a raccoon awaken from its slumber around sunset, crawling out of the trunk of that tree and climbing down.

Only one unfortunate death recorded, and not in Iowa City itself. Breathtaking. More news here. Iowa City is one of America's quintessential college towns. For its small size, it has a lot of character, and I really miss some of the things that I grew comfortable with while I was there. It's fighting one of those marvelous battles against monopolistic retail business, and I hope that its recovery from this disaster doesn't imperil the victory it requires.

Want some strange tales from Iowa City in literature? Check out Denis Johnson's Jesus' Son. Haven't seen the movie so won't dare to speak to it.

← ArmsControlWonk AaronGleeman.com →

Gregarius » Looking for Someone to Lie to Me

Feeds

Looking for Someone to Lie to Me (10 unread)

Posted: May 26th, 2006, 10:23am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: May 24th, 2006, 8:24pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: May 22nd, 2006, 12:07pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: May 15th, 2006, 10:22am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: May 2nd, 2006, 8:45pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: April 29th, 2006, 9:28pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: April 25th, 2006, 10:02am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: April 19th, 2006, 9:23am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: April 19th, 2006, 8:18am PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]

Posted: April 17th, 2006, 5:53pm PDT by Michael Roston

Tags: [edit]